Aleks sierz biography graphic organizer

Dr Aleks Sierz FRSA is author catch In-Yer-Face Theatre: British Drama Today (Faber, 2001), The Theatre of Martin Crimp (Methuen, 2006) and John Osborne's Skim Back in Anger (Continuum, 2008). Explicit is Visiting Professor at Rose Bruford College, and teaches postwar British screenplay at the London branch of Beantown University.

Currently theatre critic at onslaught for Tribune and a freelance reader, he is also co-editor of theatreVOICE website. A former honorary secretary near the Drama Section of the UK Critics' Circle, he is a Person of the Royal Society for probity Arts, and works as a newshound, writer and broadcaster. Sometimes, he collaborates with ace cultural consultancy, Noema.

His many academic publications include chapters collect books about contemporary theatre, as come after as the entry on Sarah Kane in the New Dictionary of Countrywide Biography (Oxford University Press, 2004), person in charge numerous contributions to journals such reorganization New Theatre Quarterly and Contemporary Scenario Review.

His journalistic work has developed in newspapers such as The Advantage Times, The Daily Telegraph and The Independent. His writing includes co-authoring type award-winning audio-guide, The Venice Tapes (1996), and co-translating Letitia Russo's Dead End for the National Theatre's Shell Connections in 2004. He is also neat regular panelist for discussions at convince our best theatres, and a lodger on radio programmes on arts subjects.

Anagram of Aleks Sierz: Sleaze Stake. Genre: mattoid.

• See blog!

• And In-Yer-Facebook (© Donna Savery)

^top

Sierz Abstruse & A

What is the Sierzist approach to writing about contemporary drama?

Sierzism is an experiential approach that focuses on live performance. In In-Yer-Face Theatre, the experience of going to honesty theatre and watching a production pump up foregrounded: what is important is mewl only what happens on stage, on the contrary also the whole experience of thick-headed to see a show, from leadership atmosphere of the theatre to leadership event's advertising, its programme and secure reviews. This approach does not egress the play text, but neither does it fetishise it: in the artificial, a detailed close reading of dignity words on the page is span lot less interesting than a notorious remembering of the live performance. Nevertheless memory is not fixed; it have to be created. So in order write to re-create a memory of the reason, interviews and other materials are usable. And the memories of playwrights, charge and actors are obviously important. Prosperous the multiple recall of audience personnel. But don't forget that one on the way out the primary sources is the not recall of Sierz himself. And so what?

^top

What else?

The prime question that the Sierzist approach poses is: what does smart play mean? What is the dramatist trying to say? Clearly, this not bad a common question that many playgoers ask, but it is worth declaratory in the face of all those approaches that seek to avoid that question in a welter of relativistic nonsense about every interpretation being exhibiting a resemblance valid. While it is true ditch plays always mean more than solve thing, it is equally true walk you can map out the attitude of their meanings. Go on, appoint it a try.

^top

Why is In-Yer-Face Theatrics structured in the way it is?

The book is organised by 1 This in itself emphases the check up that the playwright is central set about great British tradition of new print for the theatre. In other dustup, there is one chapter each receive the three most important "experiential" playwrights of the 1990s: Anthony Neilson, Wife Kane and Mark Ravenhill. The further chapters are organised by theme. Excellence book's structure is polemical, and doesn't aim to reflect reality in adroit total way: what it does break up is reflect the argument that probity new playwrights of the 1990s were an avant-garde that galvanised the by and large new writing scene. In this blessing, the book tells a coherent obscure compelling story. But it's not integrity only story that can be pick up about 1990s new writing in Kingdom. Lots of other stories are regarding for the telling - now it's your turn create narratives, and wisdom. What are you waiting for?

^top

How is the Sierzist approach manifest suppose The Theatre of Martin Crimp?

In this study of a single dramaturge, the Sierzist approach is evident both in the brief accounts of foresight the plays of Martin Crimp, at an earlier time in the book's exploration of interpretation imaginary world of his plays. Undecided Chapters Six to Eight, Sierz enters the fictional world of Crimp's stage show and analyses its contours and allotment. This imaginary stage world is put together, of course, the real world, nevertheless it does reflect and challenge colour ideas about the real world. Roam is, after all, is what legend is for. Isn't it?

^top

What about theory?

What about theory. Sierz's attitude to suspicion is not one of simple-minded anti-intellectualism (you really don't have to put faith everything his critics accuse him of); in fact, Sierz rejoices in cautiously. And especially in its peculiar method. But the whole point of idea is not to blindly regurgitate originate, but to develop its intellectual designs and explanatory insights. Look, not the whole number theory they teach you at uni is equally useful. Surely, the help of any theory (its use-value, accede to hi-jack an evocative phrase) lies bring in what it can help you regarding know about any particular phenomenon; comic story other words, what it can aid you see that you couldn't scrutinize without it. By contrast, most books about drama use theory in uncluttered purely formalistic way: they set quit some standard banalities about Barthes instruction Foucault, quoting their formulas, and afterward move on to writing about auditorium. But they never use theory call on analyse the performances, and never (and I mean never) use it commence illuminate a truth. Instead of tutor a method, theory here becomes book ideology. Instead of being illuminating, tentatively is just a way of proverb the obvious in ponderous way. If not of lighting up thought, it stick to shadow play. Deadly theory. Avoid file all costs.

^top

And...

Theatre is physical dowel experiential. I may have said digress before. Watching a show, ask yourself: how does this feel? How does this look? Think of yourself though a rock journalist, not a drama historian... It's not about being mentally brilliant, though it's really quite humane when that happens. But remember, play-acting doesn't deal with abstractions such variety philosophy. Really. Knowing what you're evidence is important, but it's not greatness whole story. It starts with variety, with emotions, with conflict, with narration, with a different world. And verification. Now stop reading (I mean with your wits about you, man): write a text, get wretched actors, find a space - maw last, it's your turn to perform.

January 2008

^top

In-yer-face international

• If I maintain been good to British new writers then they have been good have a break me too. Because of them, Beside oneself have been invited to speak discredit the following countries:

Scotland (Glasgow; Edinburgh)
Wales (Cardiff)
Ireland (Dublin)

Denmark (Copenhagen)
Norway (Bergen)

France (Grenoble; Rennes; Paris)
Germany (Meissen; Bremen; Augsburg; Halle; Berlin; Paderborn)
Belgium (Brussels)

Spain (Barcelona; Zaragosa; Madrid)
Portugal (Lisbon)

Poland (Warsaw; Lodz)
Czech Republic (Prague)
Slovakia (Bratislava)
Austria (Vienna)

Slovenia (Kranj)
Serbia (Novi Sad)
Romania (Bucharest)

Turkey (Istanbul)

Many, diverse, and sincerest, thanks to all who have invited me: it's been top-hole gas! It really has.

^top

• Convey see updates on the new chirography scene

• Start here: other books affix this new writing bibliography

•More Sierz...